Grr...she said 'ML, you better think carefully. You will be setting precedance for all the other cases, and I am telling you that there are a few cases now who re-offended and pending reports'....
Just because I want to NR a case because this boy completed 18 months supervision, offended again and placed on supervision for the 2nd time; AND now being charged for another case prior to 2nd supervision, I AM WRONG? I AM SETTING PRECEDENCE FOR WHAT? HOW MANY CASES ARE LIKE THAT? TO HELL WITH HER, WHY IS SHE MAKING SUCH A GENERAL STATEMENT? SHE THINKS EVERY CASE IS THE SAME? AND IS SHE TRYING TO SAY WE ONLY LOOK AT ONE BLOODY ASPECT? THEN DO SOCIAL INVESTIGATION FOR F***?! AND THIS IS COMING FROM SOMEONE FROM THE TOP?
ARGH! I am disgustingly disgusted....
No comments:
Post a Comment